Deepak Ahuja Biography, Age, Tesla, Retirement and Net Worth

Deepak Ahuja Biography

Deepak Ahuja born Deepak Prabhu Ahuja is a financial executive working in the automotive manufacturing industry. He is the former Chief Financial Officer for Tesla. He announced his retirement from Tesla on the Q4 2018 Tesla earnings call.

Deepak Ahuja Age

Ahuja was born in January 1963 and is estimated to be 56 years old.

Deepak Ahuja Height

He is 6 feet tall which is equivalent to a standard height of 1.8 meters.

Deepak Ahuja Weight

He has an estimated weight of 78 kilograms.

Deepak Ahuja Education

Deepak holds a bachelor’s degree in ceramic engineering from Indian Institute of Technology. He also holds a masters degree from Robert R McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science of Northwestern University. He had enrolled at Northwestern University in 1985, with his first class being taught by Morris E. Fine.

He also spent six years working for Kennametal near Pittsburgh and obtained a Master of Business Administration qualification from Carnegie Mellon University.

Deepak Ahuja Photo

Deepak Ahuja Career

The former CFO for Tesla began his career back in 1993 working with the Ford Motor Company. He became the Chief Financial Officer for the AutoAlliance International joint venture between Ford and Mazda. He held the position while in South Africa from 2003 to 2006.

Deepak Ahuja Tesla | Deepak Ahuja CFO Tesla Motors | Deepak Ahuja Tesla Motors

He first served Tesla Motors from 2008 to 2015 as their CFO before retiring. He later joined it as the Chief Financial Officer in February 2017. On January 2019, he announced his retirement from Tesla on the Q4 2018 Tesla earnings call. He retired having served Tesla for more than 11 years.

Deepak Ahuja Net Worth

According to Forbes release on 24 October 2018, Deepak has an estimated net worth of $20.5 billion. Ahuja announced on 17 October 2018 that he would purchase an additional $20 million of his company’s stock during the next open trading window.

Deepak Ahuja Facebook

This information will be updated soon.

Deepak Ahuja Nationality

He has dual citizenship, that is, American and Indian.

Deepak Ahuja Twitter

He is not on twitter.

Deepak Ahuja Instagram

There is no provided information on his Instagram page. This information will be updated soon.

Deepak Ahuja Interview

Tesla’s CFO managed a cash crisis for Elon Musk in 2008. He’s back to do it again.

For five quarters in a row ahead of Wednesday earnings, free cash flow has been negative at Tesla, and the electric-car maker has been burning through more than $6,500 every minute, according to data compiled by Bloomberg this week.

What’s more, executives, including on the financial department, are coming and going.

Yet this isn’t the first time Tesla has had to survive some pretty harsh financial woes. And no one knows that better than Deepak Ahuja. The CFO joined Tesla in July 2008. Two months later the global economy crashed. Challenged with managing Tesla’s balance sheet through the 2008 crisis, Ahuja saw Tesla through its hugely successful IPO just two years later. Shares of the company continued on their upward trajectory, and in 2015 Ahuja retired somewhat of a hero.

Now he’s back to reclaim his hero status as a cash-manager, having retaken the CFO post in February 2017 after Jason Wheeler left the company.

Ahuja’s task will be difficult, and there probably will be speed bumps. Tesla continues to burn through cash at an alarming rate and could run out of money before year-end, according to the most bearish analyst reports. Last year the company raised more than $1 billion in equity and later offered almost $2 billion in a junk-debt issue. In late March, Moody’s downgraded Tesla credit and changed the outlook to “negative” from “stable.”

In its Wednesday earnings report for the first quarter, even though cash flow remained negative, Tesla reported a slower cash burn rate and losses that were narrower than expected. Revenue rose to $3.41 billion, outpacing analysts estimates of $3.22 billion, but it continues to spend heavily to meet production goals. Tesla ended the first quarter with a cash balance of $2.7 billion, down from $3.4 billion the previous time it reported.

Shares of the electric-car maker are down roughly 4 percent this year after boasting a near-47 percent gain in 2017. Recently, the stock has come under pressure amid investor conflict if whether Tesla’s technological advances are enough to offset production setbacks. Short interest, including some high-profile hedge fund bets against Tesla, reached 30 percent of publicly available shares recently. Tesla shares hit an all-time high of $389 in September but are down about 25 percent from that high. Trading near-$300 is still a 17 times gain from its IPO price of $17 in 2010.

“There are many, many existential threats that come along on a daily, weekly or quarterly basis; they are always there,” Ahuja said when speaking last year at the Indian Institutes of Technology where he studied as an undergraduate. He does not expect the high-stakes, high-risk aspect of the Tesla business model to change.

The hurdles Tesla faces today are similar as when Ahuja served his first term as CFO, as he explained last year: The technology doesn’t work the way the company expected. It may still be the right product, but it’s not ready. Or the time to get the product to market is longer than initially thought.

Recalling earlier Tesla production issues, he said, “To compound it we had this super-aggressive production ramp we thought would go from zero to 400 cars a week, in six months, and we could barely touch 200,” he said during his talk in India last year. “Dealing with that becomes an existential crisis because the revenue is not coming and costs are piling up. Those challenges don’t stop, and I don’t think they are over for Tesla. There’s still a big path ahead of us.”

There’s now more pressure on the finance team to oversee more stringent spending, with Musk citing questionable company expenditures in a recently leaked email to employees:

“A fair criticism leveled at Tesla by outside critics is that you’re not a real company unless you generate a profit, meaning simply that revenue exceeds costs. … Going forward, we will be far more rigorous about expenditures. I have asked the Tesla finance team to comb through every expense worldwide, no matter how small, and cut everything that doesn’t have a strong value justification. All capital or other expenditures above a million dollars, or where a set of related expenses may accumulate to a million dollars over the next 12 months, should be considered on hold until explicitly approved by me.”

Driving back to the future
When the global economy tanked in 2008, things got so bad at Tesla, so fast, Ahuja couldn’t face telling his family. Tesla was closing on a $100 million series E round “which completely fell apart,” Ahuja noted last year in India, “and it meant we had to completely redesign our business plan,” he said.

He spared no one when it came to considering cuts. Tesla laid off 30 percent of its workers. “I thought maybe I’ll be let go. It made sense. Why have a high-paid CFO when you don’t need it?”

“Those were the dark, dark days — the nuclear winter, so to say,” Ahuja recalled last year. “We went through a period where we felt like payroll won’t be met next week.”

The only money coming in was Elon Musk’s personal investment in the company. After having moved his family across the country from a stable job at Ford to Tesla, the executive faced a stark reality: “I was prepared to move in a week if Tesla blew up, and it could have happened, I am sure,” he said. “Somehow we survived that.”

Today CFRA’s Levy thinks the fears of imminent bankruptcy in Tesla’s case are overstated. “I think it doesn’t matter a whole lot what they announce this quarter. Most of the bulls and bears will dig in,” he said. “To me the catalyst is to start meeting objectives.”

Levy believes they are closer to the date where they can start turning things around on a sustainable level, generating cash flow and making a profit. “But the longer it takes for them to make the Model 3 viable, the greater the risk.”

“It’s just one quarter; this is a multiyear story,” said David Whiston, auto equity Morningstar analyst who has a fair value of $235 on the stock. “I am more optimistic than some but very cognizant of all the risks. With all the hype, not enough attention has been paid to balance-sheet risk. Elon is the company in a sense. To investors.”

“They say a lot of things, but ultimately they have to deliver,” he added. ”[Musk] can talk about 5,000 or 6,000 cars. … I don’t care, just make them.”

Tesla last announced in early April that it was making over 2,000 Model 3s a week, and planned to reach 5,000 per week in the second quarter. In the last week of April, it hit 2,270 Model 3s, Tesla announced in its quarterly report on Wednesday.

“Earnings is what it is,” Whiston said. “Pretty much the same thing every quarter, and it isn’t so much one quarter that matters. … Even if later in the year Elon’s projections turn out to be true, they are not done with the portfolio, the semi truck, and Model Y, and all that takes a lot of money.”

Musk takes on ‘boring’ Wall Street analysts
In its first-quarter earnings report, Tesla said it spent over $1 billion in the quarter but expects total CapEx will decrease from roughly $3.4 billion to roughly $3 billion. It is expecting positive cash flow, and net income, in both the third and fourth quarters of this year. Musk and Ahuja wrote in the quarterly letter to investors that the CapEx decrease would be driven by “focusing on the critical near-term needs that benefit us primarily in the next couple of years.” The company said it has a plan to “significantly cut back” the amount of money it spends on its facilities and equipment.

CFRA’s Levy noted that profitable quarters in the past have been achieved by Tesla, but have not been sustained, though they have preceded an additional capital raise. That’s a cash-raising move that analysts believe would lessen the tail risk. After its stock reached an all-time high late last year, near $390, some analysts had expected Tesla to take advantage of the timing to issue more equity. Some still think it’s the right move. “Right now, it’s prudent for them to do a capital raise, an equity raise,” Levy said.

Musk said again on Wednesday’s call that the company had no need to raise capital. But as Tesla’s cash issues linger, and analysts press for more details, Musk seems to have lost patience with the quarterly Wall Street game. During the earnings call, Musk criticized investors’ focus on short-term volatility, advised investors who don’t understand the long-term view to selling the stock, and slammed day traders, as well as the media. He took questions via Youtube from an individual Tesla investor, and referred to analyst questions as being “so dry,” and a question on gross margins from a Bernstein analyst, specifically, as “boring” and “bonehead.”

Tesla shares, which initially had moved higher in post-earnings, after-hours trading, shed as much as $2 billion in value as the call progressed.

Adopted from:

Deepak Ahuja News

Tesla CFO Deepak Ahuja Leaves Company Following Automaker’s Ambitious Promises

Tesla’s chief financial officer Deepak Ahuja has left the company following the automaker’s promises on Wednesday to make less expensive Model 3 sedans, start vehicle production in Shanghai’s new Gigafactory, and increase profits this year, Reuters reports.

Ahuja’s departure and Tesla’s inability to reach projected profits for the end of 2018 led to company shares dropping by nearly six percent. The former CFO will be replaced by Tesla’s vice president of finance, Zack Kirkhorn.

The ambitious young automaker laid off seven percent of its workforce this month, with CEO Elon Musk pointing toward an imperative need to cut costs in order to stay on target of Tesla’s long-term goals. The billionaire was adamant about this particular reasoning during a conference call with analysts.

“We have to be relentless about costs in order to make affordable cars and not go bankrupt,” he said.

While Musk mentioned strong demand for the company’s Model 3 and is eager to supply customers across Europe and Asia, it expressed concern regarding the logistics of global deliveries from its Fremont, California factory.

The automaker remains publicly optimistic that it can post a profit in the first quarter of this year, and said it intends on lowering the price of the Model 3 if completion of its new Gigafactory in Shanghai is done sooner, rather than later. The goal here is to produce half a million vehicles per year by the second quarter of 2020 — a goal originally set for 2018.

As it stands, the Shanghai Gigafactory will produce 3,000 Model 3s per week. Fremont, meanwhile, will increase production to 7,000 Model 3s per week by the end of the year. At least, that’s the company’s current goal.

“Bottom line is we need the Shanghai factory to achieve that 10,000 rates and have the cars be affordable,” said Musk. “The demand for Model 3 is insanely high. The inhibitor is affordability.”

To his point, the least expensive available Model 3 currently costs $44,000, with Musk setting his sights on offering the originally planned $35,000 price point by mid-2019. Then again, this was a self-described “rough guess.”

If you’re doubting Tesla’s ability to stay afloat financially, you’re not alone. Equity Analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, Nicholas Hyett, for instance, considers 2019 to be the year that clarifies the automaker’s abilities to survive.

“Tesla has a fantastic brand, and by all accounts a fantastic product, but we’re worried it’s also fantastically expensive,” he said. “2019 could prove a make-or-break year.”

Ultimately, we’ll have to track the company’s progress on several existing fronts: operational costs, Gigafactory completion, and the stock market’s subsequent confidence in the company itself. Though Tesla made $311.5 million net profit in the third quarter of last year, that number dropped to $139.5 million in the fourth — when regulatory credits stopped bolstering its figures.

On the other hand, 2018 did conclude relatively successfully for Tesla, as the latter half of the year remained profitable. As it stands, all we can do is wait.

Adopted from: